Problems of re-studying and periodization of the history of literature at the stage of independence
Keywords:
əдeбиeттaну, əдeбиeт тaрихы, əдeби мұрa, дəуірлeу, aрхeтип, хронологияAbstract
Acquisition of independence of our country directed on the new channel all our spiritual and cultural essence, literature and history. In the years of independence and the science of Kazakh literary criticism began work on correction of earlier admitted. Overestimation and periodization of the whole history of our literature from the point of view of modernity has become an actual problem of the science of Kazakh literature. On the basis of research and new research, the views of literary scholars identified the origins of Kazakh literature, in accordance with the laws of literature differentiated and enriched the various stages of the history of literature and their drafters. The article evaluates and analyzes the research and new research conducted at the stage of independence, such literary critics as S. Kirabaev, T. Kakishev, M. Myrzakhmetov, A. Kyraubaeva, T. Yansegenuly, I. Nurakhmet. The article describes in detail the achievements and errors, role in the evaluation of representatives and the different stages of the history of the literature of the multi-volume «Kazakh debien of history», which was developed by a group of scholars whose aim was the establishment of a multivolume history of Kazakh literature, meets the requirements of the new era